MFA Postmortem: The Case for a Formalized Philosophy of Fiction

Why a Philosophy of Fiction?

Upon graduating with my MFA in Creative Writing, I was given an exit survey meant to gauge the efficacy of the program, determine what areas they might improve, and probably get a sense of the quality of our experience. I will preface this blog post by saying that my experience was unquestionably life-changing and valuable in ways I never could have anticipated; I was introduced to serious, talented, skilled, honest writers from various backgrounds and was exposed to challenging ideas about what it means to be a writer in the modern world. Long story short: I am an advocate for MFA programs. I think anyone who wants to take their writing seriously should pursue their MFA and they should do it now. You will get better at writing, no doubt in my mind.

That being said, the primary focus of my comments on the MFA exit survey dealt with the moral and ethical conversations we were having outside the classroom. I realized quickly that much of the progress I made in my writing stemmed more from informal conversations on taboo subjects, conversations made possible because of my cohort’s shared interests. My guess is that most MFA programs function similarly, where the workshops offer you a platform to create new work and receive immediate feedback on that work, yet the larger social, ethical, and moral conversations about this work take place primarily outside the classroom where students feel freer to step on toes, challenge norms, and pose the question seriously of who gets to write what.

This is not to say these philosophical conversations (as I viewed them) happened exclusively outside the classroom. Rather, the conversations I did have in the workshop that touched on issues of depiction, perspective, or sociocultural norms took place circumstantially. That is, we only held these discussions if they came up organically, while observing someone’s work that may have struck a nerve in one reader but not in others, for example. Many of my peers saw no real problem with this as we usually ended up continuing those conversations after class over a few beers.


Degrees in creative writing are incredibly undervalued in the job market for a variety of reasons. In my view, one remedy to this is to be deliberate in building curriculum for MFA candidates that challenge them in ways other fields cannot. Namely, introducing a formalized Philosophy of Fiction (as well as Nonfiction and Poetry) that addresses moral, ethical, and sociocultural concerns deliberately, directly, and explicitly, as opposed to leaving important conversations up to circumstance.

This blog will function primarily as a place where I will build the case for a formalized philosophy addressing the implications of fiction in the real world. In my view, the creative writing workshop space provides a unique forum where intentions can be evaluated in real time, something that would all-together be rejected in literary discourse and other fields that focus on literary criticism (after all, the only good poet is a dead poet).

Intention is key. Our ability to discuss intention in the workshop is the backbone of what makes the MFA valuable. Why? Because very rarely are someone’s motivations assessed and analyzed so immediately through the current social, political, and cultural lens. When we talk about adding value to the MFA, I believe that a formal study of creative intention could help legitimize the field and simultaneously prevent the field from being consumed by identity politics. In an ideal scenario, understanding creative intention could pave the way to a much better understanding of talent, another aspect I will elaborate on in future blog posts. The implications of a formalized Philosophy of Fiction are vast, especially when considering the reality of changing technologies, the growth and immediacy of small press publications, and the highly polarized sociopolitical landscape in which modern authors create their work.

Establishing classes designed around deliberate philosophical conversations will provide MFA candidates a platform to discuss the ethical and moral implications of depiction. Consider the impact a conversation focused on depictions of race, gender, sexuality, class, age, etc., would have on your own writing. At minimum, these conversations can only enhance the value of the MFA by challenging candidates outside of their comfort zone, encouraging them to more confidently take risks in their writing because they are aware of the implications of their work. If these conversations are held only in an informal capacity, then we cannot guarantee MFA candidates nearly as much confidence in their own writing. These conversations cannot be left to circumstance; a formal incorporation of philosophy into the MFA model will avoid a fall into identity-driven biases and it will equip candidates with confidence, perspective, and foresight that will inevitably enhance their creative work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s